Sunday, February 28, 2010

Traildogs.org




Check out http://www.traildogs.org/ for information culled mostly from newpapers


This website is dedicated to people who enable their dogs to run, hike,
swim, work and play in the Great Outdoors.


...


We believe that all responsible citizens, including those with dogs, should be able to enjoy our beautiful, natural land. It is alarming to us that many traditional areas for outdoor activity have banned off-leash and, in some cases, on-leash dog walking as recreation, with little or no effort to respect the needs of tax-paying, responsible dog owners.


He has captured many articles from many towns on leash restrictions.



Thursday, February 25, 2010

Ask your town meeting candidates questions!

If you live in Lexington, there is an election on March 1. Ask your candidates for Town Meeting (there are a number per precinct coming up) the following two questions (or other ones of your own design):

  1. Do you support allowing unleashed dogs in Willard's Woods?
  2. Do you support a total ban of dogs in Lexington Conservation areas?

Let us know the answers. Thanks!

Restoring the original Willard's Woods

The chair of the Conservation Commission, Joyce Miller, told the Commission meeting on February 23rd to look at Thomas P. Sileo's book Historical Guide to Open Space in Lexington and learn about Willard's Woods flora and fauna. Being a bookseller, I was delighted to discover that I had this somewhat scarce out-of-print book! As a member of the fledgling Friends of Willard's Woods, I tried to identify restoration projects the Commission might undertake based on Sileo's book that would help restore the woods to its original purposes. Originalism is all the rage among the Supremes, so why not in Lexington! I found four things that used to be a part of the activities at the Woods when it was a farm, but haven't been seen for years. I have added some historical pictures from the Library of Congress that would give some idea of how Willard's Woods might have looked in these bygone days as a guide to the restoration that could be undertaken. These would require some serious permit negotiations!


Summertime damming of Willard Brook for children's swimming [p113]


Fox hunting. Somewhat out of fashion, but I have seen foxes at Willard's. [p112]


Enormous brood of 2000 chickens! The impact of dog guano is nothing compared to this. [p107]


Horse racing and a horse exercise ring. Where have the horses gone in Willard's? [p107]


Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Conservation Commission Meeting: Neither Heat Nor Light

I attended last night’s meeting of the Conservation Commission and found the discussion enlightening, though more so in revealing Commission members’ positions than in sharing facts and arriving at common goals for the Woods. Since as a member of the audience I was given no opportunity to speak I’m going to share my thoughts with you here. In no particular order, here goes:

· Willards Woods is not pristine wilderness – it was a working farm for at least 140 years and was bequeathed to the town for recreational use. The pond is entirely man-made. I love the Woods and agree that it’s important not to love it to death, but when Commission members talk of “restoring” Willards I don’t know what they mean. Restoring to farming condition? Restoring to pre-settlement condition? Or restoring to when it was little used by anyone except neighbors and the occasional birder? What is the ideal state and use of Willards?

· Commission members expressed concern about trail damage by dogs. Dogs generally weigh less than people either on foot or on bikes, and I estimate there are considerably more human users of the Woods (think of the town’s school cross-country teams alone) than dogs – so I’m thinking the issue is traffic intensity rather than type of traffic.

· Commission members bemoaned the disappearance of wildlife as a result of the dog presence. I’m only one person, but in the past few years alone I’ve encountered a red fox, coyotes, hawks, owls, ducks, rabbits, voles, chipmunks, snakes, and many, many songbirds. My dog’s not interested in any of these, but I have a feeling that the dog presence has a chilling effect on the coyote population. (Did you read the recent Globe article about eastern coyotes being bigger and badder than western coyotes? Researchers have found our eastern coyotes are actually coyote-wolf hybrids. Way to go, Mother Nature! Wait – maybe these newcomers need to be nurtured along with the rest of the endangered wildlife in the Woods….)

· No one in the Commission mentioned a real threat to the Woods – the great increase in invasive plant species. Chinese Bittersweet and Multiflora Rose are both well-established and choking out native plants. How about some attention to these unwanted Woods denizens?

· One last thought: it seems to me that the Commission is ignoring an important resource. The Friends of Willard Woods had almost 200 people at that meeting, people who care about the Woods and want to share it with their dogs and the friends they meet there. Why doesn’t the Commission call on us to help?

From Margaret

Hi all- are any CC members professionally qualified to make statements about water quality, overuse criteria, etc. Many comments were made, but based on what knowledge or expertise? And frankly, why is dog walking as an outdoor activity automatically rejected on all conservation land as opposed to running, riding biking, etc

Posting

If anyone wants me to post anything here please e-mail me:

aynka@hotmail.com

Commissioner Wyman's proposal

Leslie sent around this link to the green dogs program at Rocky Woods. Commissioner Wyman proposed this as possible solution to minimize the altercations b/w dog owners and non D.Os.

http://www.thetrustees.org/places-to-visit/before-you-visit/green-dogs.html